Demonstration Violence
Anyone who has ever been to Animal Liberation (WA) protest will
know that the event is carried out in a non-violent way. At all
17 Stardust protests in April (Ed. see story)
as well as the current ones, supporters have held banners and placards
or handed leaflets to those who would accept them. All information
was offered cheerfully and patrons were wished a pleasant day. The
demos are staged on the council verge of Riverside Drive, not on
the reserve Stardust had leased from the Perth City Council. The
vast majority of the public accepted the information, we had lots
of support from the passing traffic - cheers, waving, thumbs up
and of course honking of car horns.
However, we've all had to endure the abuse that some people will
throw at any demonstrator. There are the classics like "get
a job" or "get a life" - what do they really mean
by that? - and then there are those that can only swear at you.
Still others had many of us in laughing fits with their nonsensical
statements. But all this is in the minority as most of the public
is in support of circuses not having animal acts and in support
of our peaceful demonstration.
A handful or so of individuals have supported the current demonstrations.
There were seven of us present for the violence that erupted today.
As Stardust had done the previous Saturday, they had staff video
tape the protestors. Both times the same staff member (hereafter
referred to as SV* - Stardust Video) video taped people within 2
feet or less (600mm) of their faces - (Best thing to do is just
smile) - Some people requested not to be video taped (which is perfectly
within their rights). But their requests were ignored by SV, as
his purpose was to intimidate us.
I observed SV begin to video one supporter who was handing out
leaflets to the public. I hadn't met this supporter previously,
so I don't know his name but he came along to protest (hereafter
referred to as CS** - Campaign Supporter). CS requested many times
that he not be video taped, he resorted to holding a placard in
front of his face to avoid being video taped. However SV continually
pushed the placard aside with his video camera and CS would move
aside replacing the placard in front of his face.
Suddenly the tussling turned into a fight, there was a brief exchange
of blows. Within seconds CS was on the ground after being dragged
onto the reserve. SV sat astride him and continued to punch him
about the head for another dozen or so times. All the time CS was
lying on the ground trying to shield his head against the pummelling.
Another six or seven Stardust staff (all dressed in black) circled
around whilst this took place. Suddenly it was over; CS lay on the
ground for a few minutes till he could recover his senses enough
to stand and rejoin the protest. The circus staff closed ranks and
claimed that CS assaulted SV despite the fact that he had been intimidating
protestors by pushing his video camera in their faces.
SV claimed the camera had been kicked out of his hand and was only
defending himself. One circus staff girl began screaming that she
would hit someone back if they had hit her. CS was not in any state
to stand, and yet circus staff ordered us off "their land".
For a short while there was a lot of yelling and screaming from
both the protestors and circus staff, as well as from some of the
public that had observed the incident. Circus staff accused us of
being troublemakers. We returned to the council verge when CS could
stand.
CS had many bruises and swellings around his face and head, but
he continued his protest with the rest of us in a peaceful manner.
|
I didn't see who threw the first punch, but I saw
SV continue to assault CS, even though he was unable to defend himself.
It only demonstrated to me what a violent person SV was. I can only
wonder about the treatment the animals may receive from people such
as SV.
*I believe that SV is the same person as featured in press articles
in April (Ed. see press
clipping).
**I have since met CS, but will respect his privacy and refer to
him as CS - however his injuries included a broken jaw , 3 fractured
ribs and several bruises.
J Radford
14/7/2001
Ed. Note : The West Australian Newspaper ran a story in
The West Magazine today (Saturday 14th July 2001). It was stated
by Wonona West, a female member of the circus troupe, that "we
have punchups and all sorts of things" - obviously the circus
is no stranger to violence.
Country comment
The recent events involving the young supporter being attacked
by a circus employee must be seen for what it is, an attempt to
stop protesters from trying to protect animals from people such
as these. I am wary of any group that resorts to this sort of action
as to me they seem to have something to hide when they act in this
way. If I were that person I would have no hesitation in bringing
charges against this aggressor, it seems to me that he had enough
witnesses. I am an animal lover...but not a people lover...and I
reckon if i was there, that young bloke would have had at least
one person in there to back him up... I know you animal libbers
are a peaceful bunch, but you must also look after your own, people
wont back you up if you cant or wont do the same for them, Im just
a sheila, and live in the bush, but you let me know when the next
bout is on and Ill be there, maybe Ill bring some very big blokes
with me A! I hope that next time you have your own video camera
with you. Take care Terri
T Watson
16/7/2001
Ed. Note: Point taken, but thankfully it didn't degenerate
into a brawl. Any aggression by demonstrators would be focused on
by the media and years of peaceful protests would be forgotten.
Such is our society that our demonstrators would then be portrayed
stereotypically as unemployed troublemakers. Activists have done
much good work over the years and as such our demonstrations must
always remain non- violent, we must use reason and logic to present
our argument for improved animal rights and welfare. All are welcome
to attend demonstrations, but we urge restraint when being abused
and intimidated, only then do we win!
|